As with any project, maintaining consistency in the steps before and after the final process is key to success. To maximize accuracy of GCP deployment without unnecessary methods, consider using these guidelines:
- Strategic Placement: Distribute GCPs evenly across the survey area, prioritizing areas with significant terrain variations. “GCPs act as the bridge between the map and the real world. They ensure that the latitude and longitude of features on the map align with their real-world counterparts. This alignment is crucial for a wide range of applications, including urban planning, environmental studies, and disaster management, where knowing the exact location of features is of utmost importance.”1
- Visibility: Ensure GCPs are clearly visible in the imagery. The size, color, and shape of the target should stand out to ensure that it is distinguishable and easy to reference.
- Experimentation: Test different GCP configurations to find the optimal balance for your specific project. “When monitoring changes over time, such as urban development, deforestation, or glacier movement, GCPs aid in detecting subtle shifts in the landscape. By providing a stable reference frame, GCPs enhance the accuracy of change detection analyses, allowing for reliable assessments of environmental changes.”1
By understanding the nuanced relationship between GCPs and map accuracy, you can make informed decisions to optimize your drone mapping workflow and achieve the desired level of precision without over-investing in GCPs.
The Myth of More is Better
Although the consistent practices used in the setup of GCP’s are vital, the usage of equipment during the deployment determines final results. Some may think that more equipment should be used to maintain more accurate data and results. However, adding more GCPs isn’t a guaranteed path to perfection. In fact, excessive GCPs can sometimes hinder accuracy rather than improve it. Here’s why:
- Diminishing Returns: Beyond a certain point, additional GCPs offer decreasing marginal benefits. The software may struggle to differentiate between closely spaced points, leading to errors in calculations.
- Computational Burden: Processing a large number of GCPs can be computationally intensive, potentially slowing down the mapping process without a significant accuracy gain.
- Cost and Time: Deploying and accurately surveying a large number of GCPs can be time-consuming and expensive.
Finding the Optimal Number of GCPs
The ideal number of GCPs depends on various factors, including:
- Project Scale: Larger areas generally require more GCPs.
- Desired Accuracy: Higher precision demands a denser GCP network.
- Terrain Complexity: Challenging terrain may necessitate additional GCPs.
- Software Capabilities: The photogrammetry software used can influence the optimal GCP count.
InTerra can help you determine the optimal number of GCPs for your project and ensure that your drone mapping efforts yield the highest possible accuracy. The SmarTarget® is a cost-effective and timely solution to obtain high-accuracy ground control points simultaneously with the drone flight. By using proper practices and our equipment, data will be more accurate, time saving, and cost-effective. Contact us for a free demo and more information.
Sources: